« Wi'am- Palestinian Conflict Resolution Center | Main | Peace Walks »

July 06, 2004

Comments

As a Fremont resident I'm amazed by how much controversy our 4th of
July parade has stirred up. I must admit that we didn't attend but
went to a picnic with friends instead. Nonetheless, I'm curious: do
you think should Fremont ban alternative flags in next year's parade,
or do you think the discussion that the controversy has generated is
valuable? Was this incident provocative or just divisive? Certainly I've given the parade
more thought this year than in all previous years combined.

Of course the discussion is valuable. And I don't believe in banning flags. I just want to question the patriotism of those who fly the flag of a terrorist militia that sought to overthrow the Republic.

Why pledge allegiance to "one nation, indivisible" if you're going to break that pledge by flying the flag of those who sought to divide it?

Re: flags of foreign countries - ethnic interest groups have always participated in US Independence Day parades. Think of all the Irish, Italians, Slovaks etc. who have participated in the civil life of this country in their ethnic social clubs.

The only example of foreign flags with US I can think of would be the two flag lapel pin - i.e. the Lebanese and American flag, poles crossed to make an X. I own a variation given out by Rabbi Michael Lerner at a Hanukkah party that features Palestinian and Israeli flags.

There are flag protocols that would cover the issue - i.e., when in a group of flags, the US flag always takes a certain position, with no flag to its right, and so forth. The Boy Scouts ought to know.

I commend Fremont for trying to work out this multi-culti meets Middle America conflict. My childhood hometown of Greensboro NC has plenty of immigrants from everywhere but nobody thinks of letting them fly their flags on the 4th. (or maybe they do, I haven't checked recently)

I think the flag is not for slavery but it is for everything but that. Its about our rights as southerners to have our own country, our own money rights, and our own fair way of trade. We wanted to do our stuff our own way and not have someone else tell us what to do. The north had 3 times as many slaves as the south did. Even after slavery was abolished Abraham Lincoln still kept his slave for three years after it was abolished. Also the slave trades came from the north and were sold to the southerners. And thats only part of the confederacy. People like you don't get the right idea of the confederacy and it causes only negative attention rather than really knowing what went on. I encourage people to learn and understand it.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

My Photo

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Cookbooks