My Photo

Books of Interest

Cookbooks

May 02, 2008

Not celebrating

Regarding Israel's 60th anniversary and the Palestinian Nakba, British Jews and others write: Letters: We're not celebrating Israel's anniversary | The Guardian.

Hat tip to Philip Weiss, who is running a Nakba watch at his blog. He celebrates Lila Abu-Lughod and her book, Nakba, published last year.

As'ad Abu-Khalil
alerts us to this letter to Nadine Gordimer from a professor in Gaza whose students are literally starving while reading her books.

My cold and hungry students have divided themselves into two groups, with one group adamant that you, like many of your courageous characters, will reconsider your participation in an Israeli festival that aims to celebrate the annihilation of Palestine and Palestinians. The other group believes that you have already crossed over to the side of the oppressor, negating every word you have ever written. We all wait for your next action.

April 28, 2008

Turkey sending envoy to Israel for Syria talks

Colonel Patrick Lang alerts us to this development: Turkey plans to send envoy to Israel for Syria talks.

Turkey is planning to send an emissary to Jerusalem in an attempt to find a compromise that would pave the way of peace talks between Syria and Israel, as it played down the high expectations saying there is a long way to go.

Israel's Haaretz said on Monday Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan plans to send an emissary to Jerusalem to brief Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on his recent talks with Assad in Damascus. Erdogan will apparently send his foreign policy advisor Ahmet Davutoglu, who is also in charge of talks with Syria and has in the past met with Olmert adviser, Yoram Turbowicz, in Ankara, it reported.

Israeli officials believe Turkey's involvement in the issue will increase. "Erdogan has decided to go all the way on the issue of Israel and Syria," the Israeli government source told Haaretz.

The source added that Israel has not yet received an update on Erdogan's talks in Damascus. "Talks are being conducted to chart out the issue," the source said. "The goal of Turkey's activity is to allow talks to start. That's how we view it. So far, no real negotiations are taking place."

Turkey has been mediating between Syria and Israel to restart peace talks. Israel and Syria's last round of direct talks broke down in 2000 over the details of Israel's proposed withdrawal from the Golan.

Syria has said it received word from Turkey that Israel would be willing to give back the Golan in return for peace with the Arab state.

Peace can arise from any direction.

April 21, 2008

Carter: Hamas is willing to accept Israel as its neighbor

There it is: Carter: Hamas is willing to accept Israel as its neighbor - Yahoo! News.

Former President Carter said Monday that Hamas — the Islamic militant group that has called for the destruction of Israel — is prepared to accept the right of the Jewish state to "live as a neighbor next door in peace."

But Carter warned that there would not be peace if Israel and the U.S. continue to shut out Hamas and its main backer, Syria.

The Democratic former president relayed the message in a speech in Jerusalem after meeting last week with top Hamas leaders in Syria. It capped a nine-day visit to the Mideast aimed at breaking the deadlock between Israel and Hamas militants who rule the Gaza Strip.

"They (Hamas) said that they would accept a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders, if approved by Palestinians and that they would accept the right of Israel to live as a neighbor next door in peace," Carter said.

The buzz on the internet and from my cousins with Lebanese army connections: war, war, war.

Carter's visit shows that peace is always possible. No war could solve any real problem this summer. We need sane leaders to pull the bloodthirsty back from the brink.

Update: The New York Times elaborates.

Also, regarding war, war and more war, see Joshua Landis at Syria Comment. He reprints a long analysis of the prospects for war, but Josh himself states at the outset that he thinks it won't come to that. Too costly, too little benefit to anybody. My hopeful self believes that cooler heads will prevail.

February 21, 2008

Life must go on in Gaza and Sderot

Here's a blog by two men, one from Gaza and one from Sderot, who say Life must go on in Gaza and Sderot. The quote below is from the Gaza contributor, dated today.

Today its sunny and quiet in Gaza , there is no any activity or military operations we hope every day will be quiet in both side and over the world . But still the siege control our life, borders still close and we have electricity for three to six hour and some aria more , and most of the supply not available in Gaza and if its available will be more than double price, unemployment because most of the factory closed because they cont import or export

No matter what happens, life does go on. Despite rockets raining down on both sides, despite starvation and imprisonment, people continue to live and to hope and to try to make sense of their situations. Dove's Eye View has always attempted to keep this human spirit in sight. Thank you to "Life Goes On" for adding your voice.

February 06, 2008

God Bless This Mess

Earlier I heard a radio interview of Sheryl Crow and looked up a song she mentioned: God Bless this Mess. Turns out it is a protest song, shot in front of the White House and other Washington, D.C. monuments.

One of the lines goes something like "The president comforted us with tears in his eyes/then led us into a war that was based on lies." (Doesn't scan, I'm not repeating verbatim)

Sheryl Crow was born just a few months before me; weathered breast cancer two years after my first bout; sings dark pop songs that I like. I hadn't been paying that much attention to her music since her hits of the mid-90s - I should. This song reflects my feeling-tone about this country. What a mess. Sometimes all one can do is say "God Bless."

Mess

For readers who don't hang out in US kitchens much, "God Bless this Mess" is a popular, low-culture placard that women in middle America like to post in their kitchens or family rooms. It's the plaint of an overwhelmed wife/mother/housekeeper, and would be instantly recognizable to a majority of us. Crow saw such a sign one morning, sat down and wrote her song in ten minutes.

February 03, 2008

Non-violent Actions: Hamas & Hizbullah

Helena Cobban analyzes non-violent mass actions in Gaza and Lebanon.

This is one of the many things I love about nonviolent mass action: It involves all members of society, not just the guys! Indeed, to be effective, it really needs to do so.

Back in 2006, I wrote quite a bit about the increasingly important political role being played by Hamas's well-organized networks of women supporters. That became evident both in the very successful parliamentary election campaign that Hamas mounted in January of that year, and also in some of the new style of nonviolent mass public actions that we saw from the Hamas-organized women later in the year. See, e.g., these two JWN posts from November 2006: 1 and 2.

Too many people in the west-- and certainly, nearly the whole of the western MSM-- have taken at face value the accusations from Israel and the Bush administration about Hamas (and Hizbullah) being only terrorist organizations. But that view completely misunderstands, or willfully ignores, the deep roots both organizations have struck among their respective constituencies-- roots have been nurtured and sustained through many long years of actions in various fields of nonviolent activity, including a lot of social work and electoral/political organizing. But then, something new happened, it seems to me, when people involved in those kinds of fairly private nonviolent activities take their nonviolent organizing into the mass, open, public sphere and these actions demonstrated that they can have a huge, transformatory effect on the political scene.

One example from Lebanon was the partly organized, partly "spontaneous" mass return of south Lebanese villagers to their villages in the border zone in May 2000. The puppet-run "security zone" that the Israelis had previously maintained there just crumbled overnight.

Another example from Lebanon was the very similar-- partly organized, partly "spontaneous"-- mass return of south Lebanon's people to their homes, villages, and towns, on August 14, 2006, the very day the ceasefire went into effect. That human wave of people completely swept away any hopes the Israelis may have had that they and the UN could somehow "prevent" Hizbullah's people from re-establishing themselves in southern Lebanon-- because at that point, nearly all the people who returned were Hizbullah. And, as Ze'ev Schiff (RIP) noted at the time, possession of the battlefield at the time the shooting stops is the very definition of victory. (The IDF had sent in a ground force in those last 60 hours of the war-- after the completion of the negotiations for the ceasefire, indeed-- precisely with the aim of trying to control as much of the South Lebanon battlefield as possible by the time the ceasefire went into effect. At the purely military level, however, their plans went sorely awry; and on August 13 and 14 the surviving soldiers from their badly mauled invasion force slunk back south across the border in considerable disarray, holding onto no land at all.)

Hizbullah's women have also, certainly, been seen in quite a number of the party's public demonstrations and marches, some of them organized into disciplined and slightly militaristic-looking cohorts, and some not.

Hamas women, however, seem to have been developing an even more distinctive and potentially effective role for themselves. They have run in-- and in six cases, won-- parliamentary elections. And on numerous occasions over the years they have organized all-women demonstrations with a very pointed political intent. Most recently, on January 22, more than 1,000 Hamas-organized women from Gaza swarmed across the Rafah crossing into Egypt in an action designed to publicize the plight of their families as Israel tightened the screws of its siege of the Strip-- and also, perhaps, to test the reactions of the Egyptian security forces prior to the big bust-out across the border that was being planned for the following night.

I wrote about non-violence and Gaza in November 2006. I was pretty angry that day because Israel had shot down a group of Palestinian women protesting in the street. They were "protecting" military fighters holed up in a mosque so by Israeli reasoning, they were legitimate targets, although unarmed.

Note that Cobban refers to a non-violent action in Lebanon in 2000 - this was Arnoun. Woops, I didn't have my dates correct and wasn't reading carefully.

Another non-violent action in South Lebanon was the liberation of the village of Arnoun by a group of Lebanese students in early 1999. My mother was teaching at the American University of Beirut then - many of her students skipped class to go liberate this border village from Israeli and proxy occupiers. She wrote about it at the time and the piece still stands on the internet - the link is to her article.

January 25, 2008

Never Again...

Warsaw Ghetto - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Warsaw Ghetto was established by the German Governor-General Hans Frank on October 16, 1940. At this time, the population of the Ghetto was estimated to be 440,000 people, about 37% of the population of Warsaw. However, the size of the Ghetto was about 4.5% of the size of Warsaw. Nazis then closed off the Warsaw Ghetto from the outside world on November 16, 1940, building a wall with armed guards.

During the next year and a half, thousands of the Polish Jews as well as some Romani people from smaller cities and the countryside were brought into the Ghetto, while diseases (especially typhoid) and starvation kept the inhabitants at about the same number. Average food rations in 1941 for Jews in Warsaw were limited to 253 kcal, compared to 2,325 kcal for gentile Poles and 5,613 kcal for German people. The life in the ghetto was chronicled by the Oyneg Shabbos group. In 1942 Polish resistance fighter Jan Karski reported to the Western governments on the situation in the Ghetto and on the extermination camps.

Over 100,000 of the Ghetto's residents died due to rampant disease or starvation, as well as random killings, even before the Nazis began massive deportations of the inhabitants from the Ghetto's Umschlagplatz to the Treblinka extermination camp during Operation Reinhard. Between Tisha B'Av, July 23, 1942, and Yom Kippur, September 21, 1942, about 254,000 Ghetto residents were sent to Treblinka and murdered there.

By the end of 1942, it was clear that the deportations were to their deaths, and many of the remaining Jews decided to fight.

Read for yourself. The Warsaw Ghetto is not Gaza. But Gaza is a walled camp and the Israelis are starving its residents of food, fuel and medicine.

Why build walled ghettos to confine a whole people?

Why would the children of the ghetto survivors build a walled ghetto to confine a whole people? The only humane answer is that victims of trauma act out their abuse on others unless they confront and resolve their own wounds.

The madness must stop.

January 24, 2008

Another View of the Gaza Bust-out

Interesting comment from Jonathan Edelstein at 'Just World News' (Helena Cobban's blog).

Questioning received wisdom: I think we've been wrong all along in describing the siege of Gaza as an Israeli siege. In fact, ever since Israel left the Philadelphi route, it's been an Israeli-Egyptian siege, and Egypt has maintained its end for its own reasons. Hamas correctly perceived Egypt as the military and political weak link, and chose to break the siege at the Egyptian border. I've actually wondered why it took so long; there have been partial breaches of the wall before, and I remember thinking at the time that Hamas would gain an advantage by widening them. Maybe it wasn't yet ready, but I think it's now very clear that they and Israel were never the only players.

The paradigm shift: now that the Egyptian border is open, Gaza can no longer be regarded as Israeli-occupied territory. Some scholars such as Dugard maintain that the occupation continued after the 2005 withdrawal because Israel continued to control the access points. I've argued in the past that international law precedents, such as the ICJ's judgment in the DRC-Uganda case, don't support this interpretation and that the occupation ended once Israel gave up effective control on the ground. At this point, however, the argument is moot: as long as the Egyptian border stays open, Gaza can't seriously be regarded as occupied even under Dugard's interpretation. This would mean that the law of belligerent occupation no longer applies to Gaza, although the humanitarian law of war, including the provisions relating to siege, still do.Israel is no longer legally responsible (note: legal and moral responsibilities aren't necessarily the same) for the general welfare of Gaza, or for supplying its people with goods like electricity or fuel.

I did not understand until yesterday how much Egypt has cooperated with Israel to starve the people of Gaza. Jonathan is an original thinker and always sees trends and possibilities that other analysts miss.

January 20, 2008

War Crimes in Gaza: Juan Cole Lays it Out

Read all about war crimes in Informed Comment.

Israeli deployment of excessive force in recent weeks has resulted in dozens of deaths in Gaza. Even if military action were justified, it is only legitimate for the Israelis to punish Hamas fighters doing the firing, and big bombs should not be dropped near civilian apartment buildings. Don't they, like, have SWAT teams?

Professor Juan Cole cites the relevant articles of the Geneva Convention.

Just because Israel has done this before, and just because the US lets Israel do it, does not mean that it is legal, moral, justified, or somehow not a crime against humanity as described by the Geneva Conventions.

But I guess the argument, which we might see in comments, goes like this: "it doesn't count if they're Palestinians, because Palestinians deserve it, and anyway, Israel does not commit war crimes because remember the Holocaust! And anybody who says otherwise is an anti-Semite, so there! And Israel just has to defend herself! 9/11! Islamofascists! Rocket attacks! Al-Qaeda is going to nuke America so anything Israel does in Gaza/West Bank/Lebanon is reasonable defensive action!"

Oh, and let's not forget that old chestnut, which I first heard in 1974 when Israel bombed the refugee camp next to my village: "Palestinian terrorists hide in the skirts of their women, so if Israel happens to kill women and children while fighting terrorists, it's absolutely the terrorists' fault."

Read the Geneva Conventions - that argument is grounds for a war crime charge, too.

Oh yes, but I just remembered - Bush and Company say that 9/11 changed everything, and we don't need no stinking Geneva Conventions. Guess the Israelis don't either.

September 11, 2007

Is Israeli Aggression Wrong?

Who wrote this, and in what newspaper? Rattling the Cage: What Israeli aggression?.

...countries aren't supposed to fly their jets into another country's airspace without permission. It's considered an invasion. An act of aggression. It gives the invaded country a casus belli - a justification to strike back.

In short, it's wrong. It's the sort of thing that starts wars, and countries are supposed to try to avoid wars, not start them.

So Israeli leaders have nothing to say about the Syrian reports. This is the diplomatic equivalent of a wink. Everyone understands.

What's hard to understand, though, is how the Israeli media can be so docile, so obedient, in the face of such a reckless Israeli act. I was watching Channel 2 Thursday night, and I couldn't believe what I was hearing, or rather not hearing.

None of the journalists, who clearly assumed that this incident had really taken place, thought it worth mentioning that Israel had just risked starting a war with Syria. None of them challenged Israeli officials on the wisdom of this. All they talked about was what Syria might do now, whether Syria would go to war. That Israel had just provoked Syria, had just escalated the conflict, was the elephant in the newsroom that they pretended not to see.

That would be Larry Derfner, known "lackey for the Syrian government," writing in that "pro-Assad propaganda rag," the Jerusalem Post.

Hat tip to Josh Landis, a loyal American and respected professor of Syria Studies.