And furthermore, shelling civilians is a war crime. You don't do it, according to the Geneva Conventions. America does it in Iraq, Israel does it in Lebanon and Gaza, so I guess the Lebanese Army feels like they can do it with impunity, and no one will call them to account.
My view of this will be unpopular among some of my kinsmen. Sorry. (No, I'm not really sorry. I love my relatives, but I will not remain silent in this case. We will have to agree to disagree)
As'ad Abu-Khalil, with whom I do not always agree, says:
The footage on Aljazeera tonight from inside the Nahr Al-Barid refugee camp is sufficient to condemn all those who stayed silent during another chapter of agony for the Palestinians in Lebanon. I am sickened by the rising manifestations of Lebanese patriotism: by the unending tributes for an Army that was too scared to defend the homeland when Israel invaded last summer.
This bombing is not good for the future of Lebanon. If Fatah al-Islam is such a problem, aren't there other ways to address it than by causing immense suffering among civilians, and thereby creating a whole new generation of future recruits to terrorism?
The decades of attacks on Ain-el-Helweh camp led directly to the events of 1985 that killed my grandmother in Mieh-mieh and uprooted all of my kinsmen. Bombing refugee camps to "eradicate terrorism" just creates more terrorism.
It may be a basic human instinct to want to eradicate (massacre, exterminate, commit genocide) your enemies, but acting on this instinct does not make you or your property safer. Mass extermination of the Palestinians of Lebanon will not make Lebanese safer. Mass bombing with "only" 40 or 80 or 100 dead will not make Lebanese safer, either.
I fear we are in a spiral of death. I fear much worse will follow.
Human Rights Watch is on the case.
Sadly, my American government is too blind, stupid and bloodthirsty to intervene in this. And it looks like the Arab governments don't care, either.